Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Fwd: Re: Storing Generated Code in Git [Was: master 9079e3a: Cheat and try to fix the generated file manually.]


From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:26:40 +0200

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:17:32PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
So perhaps what we should do is:

        not check generated code into Git;

        put all generated code into the source tarballs.

+2

Presumably we should rebuild all the DCERPC files as well at buildtime
then?

YEs, once we have a version in our source that is actually capable of doing that.
It doesn't build all files for me.

If that's possible, yes. I don't actually know how to generate them, so I
don't know how fast and/or cross-platform it is.

See epan/dissectors/pidl/README on how to do that in tree (in theory).

Ciao
   Jörg


-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: