Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format]
From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:32:39 +0200
Le 10 juil. 2014 23:19, "Peter Wu" <peter () lekensteyn nl> a écrit :
Hi all, I would like to have the proto_tree_add_subtree and proto_tree_add_subtree_format functions backported to master-1.12. Any
objects
to that? It is only a new addition to the API, so it should be pretty
safe.
It should make backporting changes easier. (read: backport a refactoring
(WIP)
to reduce code duplication in the SSL and DTLS dissectors.)
IMHO we have already waited too long to freeze 1.12 content and while those code refactoring are nice to have, they do not seem mandatory for the new stable branch. We should only apply bugfixes from now and publish a new RC followed shortly by the final 1.12.0 release. If there are blocker bugs, we should identify them ASAP. Just my 2 cents, Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Peter Wu (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Pascal Quantin (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Bill Meier (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Guy Harris (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] mmann78 (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Peter Wu (Jul 11)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] mmann78 (Jul 10)
- Re: Backport request for proto_tree_add_subtree[_format] Pascal Quantin (Jul 10)