Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Backport r49648?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:12:39 -0500
On 01/07/14 19:30, Joerg Mayer wrote:
Today I saw an expert info about an invalied hf_index or somethin like that on a customer's windows 1.10.5 wireshark in packet-t124.c. Which I can't reproduce on my machine (suse13.1, svn head). The only "interesting" change seems to be: jmayer@egg:~/work/wireshark/svn/trunk/asn1/t124> svn log -c49648 packet-t124-template.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r49648 | morriss | 2013-05-31 04:27:40 +0200 (Fr, 31 Mai 2013) | 6 lines
[...]
So maybe it should be backported to 1.10?
Yes, it makes sense: those warnings pop out due to r49644 which was back-ported to both trunk-1.10 and trunk-1.8. I added this revision to the queue for both trunks.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Backport r49648? Joerg Mayer (Jan 07)
- Re: Backport r49648? Jeff Morriss (Jan 08)