Wireshark mailing list archives

do we continue to reference revision numbers?


From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:17:59 -0500

In the past with svn, when we found a bug caused by a previous code change, we used the revision number in bugzilla 
comments with a  leading ‘r’, like ‘r12345’.  This would auto-create a very convenient url link in bugzilla to the svn 
browsing web pages.  Now that we’re on git, do we:
1) continue to use revision numbers?  or do we use commit ids? or change-ids?
2) continue to use ‘r[number]’ in bugzilla, or some new syntax?

-hadriel

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: