Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Backporting r54812
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:05:04 -0500
r50646/ga39e5b9 should definitely be backported - that it isn't on the list was an oversight on my part. r50647/g3e8b8f0 is just a comment update - feel free to ignore or backport depending on which is easier. On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
The last item in the old roadmap task list is backporting r54812/gdae8660 to master-1.10. However, it appears to depend on r50646/ga39e5b9 and r50647/g3e8b8f0. Should they be backported as well? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Backporting r54812 Gerald Combs (Feb 24)
- Re: Backporting r54812 Evan Huus (Feb 24)