Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: What Wireshark base version to use for customization


From: Stephen Fisher <sfisher () SDF ORG>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:08:25 -0700

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:51:23PM -0500, John Dill wrote:

So what restrictions are there when you have a Wireshark plugin that 
contains proprietary information (which can be of the do not export 
variety) from the govt or customer and they do *not* want that 
information released to the public, since Wireshark can be used as a 
tool to visualize and analyze these private kinds of protocols?  If 
some of that implementation leaks into the Wireshark application (like 
hiding all of the unnecessary protocol cruft to make it simpler for 
user to use), what are the implications?

Is the proprietary information short, such as encryption keys?  A 
preference can be used for things like that and then only if the 
user's preferences file is shared will it get out.  If that's a 
high-risk, you could even have the dissector/plug-in do something 
non-stndard like reading a file for the information (but we probably 
wouldn't want that kind of dissector in the base source).

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: