Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: QT_MIN_VERSION


From: "Maynard, Chris" <Christopher.Maynard () GTECH COM>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 12:14:57 -0400

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-
bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Michal Labedzki
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 1:46 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] QT_MIN_VERSION

I use "" instead of "styleName()" and everything seems to be ok. What about use
conditional define with QT version?

However I vote for update to 4.8.0

I would prefer not to do this, if at all possible, until at least the end of the RHEL6 Production 1 Phase.
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata

Currently we don't necessarily have any particular need or desire to deploy qtshark on these systems; however:
1) Others may want to?
2) I'm unable to create .rpm's using --without-qt. (or with both --without-gtk2 and --without-gtk3 for that matter, but 
that hasn’t been a problem since I just don’t bother installing the gnome rpm that’s generated.)

RHEL6 doesn't have GTK3, so I’m forced to use, at a minimum, --with-gtk2, and of course change wireshark.spec.in as 
well:

%bcond_with    gtk2
%bcond_without gtk3
%bcond_without qt

Unfortunately, that fails as follows:

…

+ desktop-file-validate 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/share/applications/wireshark.desktop
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note
Processing files: wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64
error: File not found: 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/bin/wireshark-qt
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.IxX5Gn

…

RPM build errors:
    File not found: 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/bin/wireshark-qt
make: *** [rpm-package] Error 1

Incidentally, the same type of failure happens if you try using --without-gtk2 --without-gtk3 --with-qt=yes instead, 
along with:

%bcond_without gtk2
%bcond_without gtk3
%bcond_with    qt

as well as the change to ui/qt/qt_ui_utils.cpp to use “” instead of font.styleName():

…

+ desktop-file-validate 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/share/applications/wireshark.desktop
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note
Processing files: wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64
error: File not found: 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/bin/wireshark-gtk
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.v8wtRC

…

RPM build errors:
    File not found: 
/home/wireshark/wireshark-1.12.0/packaging/rpm/BUILDROOT/wireshark-1.12.0-1.x86_64/usr/local/bin/wireshark-gtk
make: *** [rpm-package] Error 1


On 7 August 2014 20:13, Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com<mailto:Christopher.Maynard () gtech 
com>>
wrote:
configure.ac lists QT_MIN_VERSION as 4.6.0.

Attempting to compile 1.12.0 on RHEL6 with qt-4.6.2-24.el6.x86_64 fails with:

qt_ui_utils.cpp: In function 'void smooth_font_size(QFont&)':
qt_ui_utils.cpp:58: error: 'class QFont' has no member named 'styleName'

Apparently styleName isn't available until 4.8.0.

https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;
h=8afb6106f2fb565aff0ec9f00b3dcf7217ed5255

Ideas as to how best to fix these ... besides setting QT_MIN_VERSION to 4.8.0?

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the intended 
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender by replying to this email.  Thank you.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: