Wireshark mailing list archives
Plugin Dissector vs Builtin Dissector
From: Kevin Cox <kevincox () kevincox ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:19:43 -0400
Hello, Forgive me if this has been asked before but I can't find any resources about the advantages/disadvantages of plugin dissectors and the ideal cases for each. So far I have gathered that plugin dissectors are "easiest to write initially"[0] while builtin dissectors load slightly faster. [0] https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChDissectAdd.html I have read the README.{developer,dissector,plugin} and a number of others but can't find a resource to help me decide which to write. For the curious I will be working on a dissector for the Ceph[1] protocol as a gsoc project this summer and am trying to make the decision whether a builtin or plugin dissector would be preferred. [1] https://ceph.com/ Cheers, Kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Plugin Dissector vs Builtin Dissector Kevin Cox (Apr 23)
- Re: Plugin Dissector vs Builtin Dissector mmann78 (Apr 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Plugin Dissector vs Builtin Dissector John Dill (Apr 23)