Wireshark mailing list archives
Visual studio versions
From: Graham Bloice <graham.bloice () trihedral com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:52:27 +0100
A recent question on Ask Wireshark [1] brought up the issue of which version of Visual Studio we should be targeting with releases. Part of the issue is all the 3rd party libs that may be linked with a specific version of the MSVC run-time DLL. It has been suggested that we move to VS2012, is there a QT for 2012? Maybe even go to 2013. I would like us to use the most recent (as long as it's been out for 3 months or so) version of VS for a new release, is this practical? Apart form dev's own VS environments there are the buildbots to consider. I also read somewhere else that MS will supply VS licences for open source projects, do you know anything about that Gerald? [1] : http://ask.wireshark.org/questions/31771/new-build-1106-on-vs2012-missing-msvcr100dll -- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Visual studio versions Graham Bloice (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Pascal Quantin (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Gerald Combs (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Anders Broman (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Pascal Quantin (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Anders Broman (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Graham Bloice (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Anders Broman (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions mmann78 (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Gerald Combs (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Pascal Quantin (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Gerald Combs (Apr 16)
- Re: Visual studio versions Pascal Quantin (Apr 16)