Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: What does [WIP] really mean?
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:09:25 -0700
On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:If a reviewer thinks the current patch is "a good start" for a feature (and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay to give the +2?I don't see why not, but he or she should probably check with the submitter first.
So +1 might be better - that way, the submitter can +2 the code if they deem it ready for prime time. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- What does [WIP] really mean? mmann78 (Apr 11)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Gerald Combs (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Evan Huus (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Guy Harris (Apr 14)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Bálint Réczey (Apr 15)
- Re: What does [WIP] really mean? Gerald Combs (Apr 14)