File-scope memory on subsequent passes

[Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>]

I recently found that there are some dissectors which allocate
file-scope memory every time they dissect a packet (not just on the
first pass, when the packet is unvisited). Can anybody think of a
reason for this, or should it be considered a bug?

I have attached a trivial (if hacky) patch which adds an assertion if
file-scope memory is used during the second pass of two-pass tshark.
Applying this and then running "fuzz-test.sh -2" on the menagerie
results in many failures.

This is not a proposal or anything, just an idea I had that produced
some unexpected results. I am curious if this is a valid use or known
issue or something.

Cheers,
Evan

Attachment: wmem_file_scope_second_pass.patch
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe