Wireshark mailing list archives
fuzzing UDP/TCP dissectors with no port assignment
From: mmann78 () netscape net
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:22:45 -0400 (EDT)
Anders brought up a question in bug 9241 that I've always been curious about (and I think the discussion is better served on -dev than the bug). We have many TCP/UDP dissectors that don't have an IANA assigned port number or are not setup as heuristic dissectors. In these cases their port number = 0 and it's up to a user preference to set it to a value corresponding to their trace. If that step is required to invoke the dissector, how are the fuzzbots handling it? Are all of these dissectors just not getting fuzzed?
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- fuzzing UDP/TCP dissectors with no port assignment mmann78 (Oct 08)
- Re: fuzzing UDP/TCP dissectors with no port assignment Anders Broman (Oct 08)
- Re: fuzzing UDP/TCP dissectors with no port assignment Evan Huus (Oct 08)
- Re: fuzzing UDP/TCP dissectors with no port assignment Anders Broman (Oct 08)