Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 21:47:02 +0200
<disclaimer>In reading this mail it sounds somewhat harsh. It's not intended that way but I'm somewhat sleep deprived right now and don't want to spend the time rephrasing it.</disclaimer> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:13:03AM -0700, Matthieu Patou wrote:
Which bugnumber(s) are still open?
Not answered.
Sorry this is not an excuse
This is not an excuse, it's an explanation. Previously I cared about the dissectors and tried to make sure that the pidl generated dissectors were changed at the source. So it was manually monitored because this happened time and again.
I mean you can complain that it's hard to run pidl but if a file is autogenerated with a big fat warning at the top you don't modify it by hand.
Actually it is quite easy to miss: Opening a file at a specific line (first match of some RE) or running an automated script on a file.
[...] here it looks more like a bit of lazyness sure doing the right fix is more complicated but in the long run it's a big win for everybody.
Of course it is some sort of lazyness. But without that lazyness even more patches remain unapplied (which is another of your complaints). What we need is some way to notice that we are patching a generated file or to make sure we "can't" modify generated files. Your email caused a thread on how to fix this problem *reliably* on wireshark-dev.
As I said in another thread: "We might have some work to do to insure that the regenerating the files for wireshark is as simple as checking out the samba-tree and running the pidl command. "
So I need to check out a huge code base to just get a small tool? How about moving pidl into a sub-git that can be ckecked out without needing to check out the whole of samba?
Also maybe it would be nice that I can modify the page http://wiki.wireshark.org/Pidl to have a simple guide there too, this page is way too complicated and ihmo not completely accurate.
As you are one of the people who are quite likely to know best what is amiss with that page, the solution with the least total time invested in the correction would probably be that you correct that page. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors, (continued)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors ronnie sahlberg (Oct 03)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Andrew Bartlett (Oct 05)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors ronnie sahlberg (Oct 03)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Andrew Bartlett (Oct 05)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors ronnie sahlberg (Oct 03)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Evan Huus (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 06)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Jeff Morriss (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Anders Broman (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 08)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 21)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors mmann78 (Oct 21)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Matthieu Patou (Oct 26)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors ronnie sahlberg (Oct 03)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Jeff Morriss (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Guy Harris (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Joerg Mayer (Oct 07)
- Re: Wireshark PIDL generated dissectors Guy Harris (Oct 07)