Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Future of glib?
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 14:04:46 -0800
GTK+ depends on GLib, but not the other way around. The 64-bit OS X development packages currently ship with GLib and Qt but not GTK+. On 11/3/13 1:53 PM, Roland Knall wrote:
I agree, but glib is still part of gtk. And as of now, the normal way of installing glib would be to install gtk onto the system. So basically you have two frameworks, and you will need both to develop for ws from now on. I am not trying to change anything here, and I accept that as of right now, no change is necessary. But as long as new dissectors are integrated, new code is being written, everything in the main libraries is being based on glib. And gradually changing something from here on out seems to be a petter plan than to change anything later in a rather short time-span. btw, I do not suggest changing to c++, I honestly do not know what the target should be. regards, Roland p.s.: I am fine with glib staying. Depend on some of the functionality for my dissectors anyway. On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:On 11/3/13 12:54 PM, Roland Knall wrote:Hi Just a short question. If the long-term goal is to switch to Qt, what ist the long-term plan for glib? As of now, many dissectors use the data types, tables, etc. Should they be replaced with Qt calls, default datatypes (e.g. guint16 => uint16_t, ...) ? What is the course here?I don't think GLib will go away any time soon. It provides a lot of useful functionality and as you point out Wireshark uses it all over the place. It also doesn't require switching anything outside of ui/qt to C++. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Roland Knall (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Joerg Mayer (Nov 03)
- Re: Future of glib? Gerald Combs (Nov 03)