Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS
From: Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:01:52 +0100
Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy () alum mit edu):
On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:09 PM, jmayer () wireshark org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=53619
User: jmayer Date: 2013/11/27 11:09 PM
Log: Having a generated file in the source tree is not fun.
Should we add a top-level rule to make it, and remove it from SVN?
+1 Last time I added a protocol and modified release-notes.asciidoc, I couldn't figure out if/how I should update NEWS. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Guy Harris (Nov 27)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Martin Kaiser (Nov 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Joerg Mayer (Nov 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Graham Bloice (Nov 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Joerg Mayer (Nov 28)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS Martin Kaiser (Nov 28)