Wireshark mailing list archives

How to replace proto_tree_add_text()


From: Michael Lum <michael.lum () starsolutions com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:10:37 -0800

I ran the checkAPIs.pl script against the files I have modified and it complains about a lot of proto_tree_add_text() 
calls.

I would like to fix them but after looking at the README.dissector document I'm left wondering if there is an easier way
than using proto_tree_add_item.

The places in the dissector where add_text() is used were for labelling parts of the protocol without having to create
filterable fields.

For example, in packet-ansi_a.c there are 457 useless add_text() calls vs 26 add_<something else>() calls.

Do I have to add 457 items (approximately, some may duplicate) to hf_register_info ?

Basically, I want to just label a bunch of bits or octets, no subtree, not filterable.

Thanks for you help.


Michael Lum (michael.lum () starsolutions com<mailto:michael.lum () starsolutions com>) | STAR 
SOLUTIONS<http://www.starsolutions.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
4600 Jacombs Road, Richmond BC, Canada V6V 3B1 | +1.604.303.2315

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: