Wireshark mailing list archives
can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained
From: Ariel Burbaickij <ariel.burbaickij () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:26:47 +0100
Hello all, obviously from several levels ""SCCP XUDT reassembly" does not control reassembly of {X,L}UDT but also of DT1s, shouldn't the corresponding parameter under preferences be adjuster or maybe better yet -- introduce several -- one for {L,X}UDT, another one for DT{1.2}? /wbr Ariel Burbaickij
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Ariel Burbaickij (Nov 22)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Jeff Morriss (Nov 25)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Ariel Burbaickij (Nov 25)
- Re: can/should SCCP XUDT reassembly be adjusted or finer-grained Jeff Morriss (Nov 25)