Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark coding style help
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:05:10 -0800
On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Michael Lum <michael.lum () starsolutions com> wrote:
Can someone tell me why code like this: i++; would have been changed to this: i += 1; ?
If the code in question is stepping through a packet, and "i" is actually "offset" or some such variable holding the offset into the packet, and other code is doing "offset += 2" or "offset += 4", people might have used "offset += 1" to make the style more consistent and to put the field length into all the incrementing lines of code. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark coding style help Michael Lum (Nov 21)
- Re: Wireshark coding style help Guy Harris (Nov 21)
- Re: Wireshark coding style help Bill Meier (Nov 22)
- Re: Wireshark coding style help Michael Lum (Nov 22)
- Re: Wireshark coding style help Bill Meier (Nov 22)
- Re: Wireshark coding style help Guy Harris (Nov 21)