Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values
From: David Arnold <davida () pobox com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:44:47 +0100
On 14/03/2013, at 9:32 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:22 PM, David Arnold <davida () pobox com> wrote:I'm working on a dissector for a protocol that encodes a timestamp as a 64-bit number of nanoseconds since midnight.Is that "midnight on a particular date", where the date appears in the packet along with the time-of-day, or is it "midnight since some implicit day" (e.g., "today") or "midnight since some date specified in some other packet"?
It's implicit, and midnight today (the protocol is NASDAQ OUCH-4.x) d ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values David Arnold (Mar 14)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Guy Harris (Mar 14)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values David Arnold (Mar 14)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Guy Harris (Mar 14)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values David Arnold (Mar 17)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Jeff Morriss (Mar 25)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values David Arnold (Mar 26)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Jakub Zawadzki (Mar 26)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Evan Huus (Mar 26)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Guy Harris (Mar 26)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Evan Huus (Mar 26)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values David Arnold (Mar 14)
- Re: BASE_CUSTOM and 64-bit values Guy Harris (Mar 14)