Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem
From: Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki () tieto com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:26:58 +0200
On 19 June 2013 20:52, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
wmem_tree_t *sub_tree = (wmem_tree_t *) wmem_tree_lookup32_array(cid_to_psm_table, key); if (sub_tree) { psm_data = (psm_data_t *) wmem_tree_lookup32_le(sub_tree, pinfo->fd->num); }
Great. Why did not I think of that? :) Thanks. You can also check https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8824where I try to switch to wmem tree in Bluetooth dissectors.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 18)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 20)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Michal Labedzki (Jun 19)
- Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem Evan Huus (Jun 19)