Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:29:39 +0100
On 01/05/2013 10:02 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:Bill Meier <wmeier@...> writes:On 1/5/2013 1:30 PM, Evan Huus wrote:I've been playing with some of the bugzilla statistics tools recently, and I am pleased to discover that despite a record number of reported bugs in 2012, we managed to shrink the backlog by 26 bugs. My raw data: Year - Created - Resolved 2012 - 1449 - 1475 2011 - 1165 - 1104 2010 - 1170 - 1239 2009 - 1201 - 1016 2008 - 1014 - 935 2007 - 863 - 805 (If someone with greated bugzilla-foo wants to provide more accurate numbers please feel free). Cheers, EvanOn that note: Another interesting stat: A record year for commits Commits to svn trunk 1998 136 1999 1247 2000 1383 2001 1652 2002 2332 2003 2660 2004 3262 2005 3945 2006 3138 2007 3661 2008 3043 2009 4011 2010 3475 2011 4602 2012 5851 BillOn that note: Another interesting stat: A record low for messages posted to both the wireshark-users and wireshark-dev mailing lists. I'm not sure what to make of that, but I'm guessing that the drop is at least somewhat due to users and developers asking questions on ask.wireshark.org instead of through the mailing lists. Hopefully it's not indicative of something else, such as a declining interest in Wireshark. YEAR -users -dev -commits -bugs -announce 2012 946 2671 8211 10457 22 2011 1406 4017 5417 8626 25 2010 2911 3918 4004 7833 22 2009 2974 4178 4375 6273 17 2008 3339 3939 3260 6072 14 2007 2529 5667 3796 4759 11 2006 1255 2969 2073 1563 9 Any ask.wireshark.org stats?None that appear to be publicly accessible. For what it's worth, ask.wireshark.org went online in September 2010, which does line up with the drop in volume on -users and -dev. Tangentially, is it perhaps worth closing -users in order to consolidate all support into the ask site? Evan- Chris References: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/ http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/ http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits/ http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs/ http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-announce/
Well, there's a little you can figure out: First question (1) posted 04 Sep '10 Last question (17472) posted 05 Jan '13 So if we distribute that through some URL manipulation: '10: #1570 +1570 '11: #8170 +6600 '12: #17341 +9171 '13: #17472 +131 (note: not all entries seem to have questions associated with them?) Maybe the management panel can give some more stats. This matches nicely with the drop in -user and -dev mailing entries. Mailing lists seem to go out of style, like anything not web based. Time to write a XUL interface for Wireshark? Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Some quick Bugzilla statistics Evan Huus (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Bill Meier (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Christopher Maynard (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Evan Huus (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Jaap Keuter (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Guy Harris (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Evan Huus (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Christopher Maynard (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Jeff Morriss (Jan 05)
- Re: Some quick Bugzilla statistics Bill Meier (Jan 05)