Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: license for Wireshark (formerly Ethereal)'s mergecap.c/merge.c
From: Scott Renfro <scott () renfro org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:45:04 +0000
Yes, GPLv2+ is fine with me. On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:28 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Scott, Several years ago you wrote a "mergecap" utility for Ethereal (now Wireshark); this work (according to the comments at the top of the file--which is now "merge.c") apparently was based on editcap.c . No licensing information is included in this module (probably because none was in editcap.c). The normal assumption would be that it would be GPLv2+ (like the rest of Wireshark) but it would be good if you could confirm that this was your intention. Thanks & regards, -Jeff
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- license for Wireshark (formerly Ethereal)'s mergecap.c/merge.c Jeff Morriss (Jan 14)
- Re: license for Wireshark (formerly Ethereal)'s mergecap.c/merge.c Scott Renfro (Jan 15)