Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Problem with tshark and SMB


From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 06:25:17 -0800

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Daniel Franganillo
<danielf () dilmun ls fi upm es> wrote:
Is this behaviour expected or should I file a bug report?

Well, it is not clear that the behavior is expected, so by all means,
file a bug report.

However, since tshark makes one pass over the packets (I believe) you
cannot expect it to do a perfect job. It might not correctly reorder
out of order packets, for example.

-- 
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
(何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操)
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: