Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Problem with tshark and SMB
From: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 06:25:17 -0800
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Daniel Franganillo <danielf () dilmun ls fi upm es> wrote:
Is this behaviour expected or should I file a bug report?
Well, it is not clear that the behavior is expected, so by all means, file a bug report. However, since tshark makes one pass over the packets (I believe) you cannot expect it to do a perfect job. It might not correctly reorder out of order packets, for example. -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂?唯有杜康。--曹操) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Problem with tshark and SMB Daniel Franganillo (Feb 15)
- Re: Problem with tshark and SMB Daniel Franganillo (Feb 17)
- Re: Problem with tshark and SMB Richard Sharpe (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Problem with tshark and SMB Daniel Franganillo (Feb 15)
- Re: Problem with tshark and SMB Daniel Franganillo (Feb 17)