Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Unused dissector tables


From: "Tyson Key" <tyson.key () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:14:55 +0000

Hi Gerald,

Although the USB CCID, and packet-rfid-* dissectors invoke others to do payload dissection, I believe that the unused 
dissector table registration code was a left-over from initial design attempts - so it's probably safe to remove it.

I hope that helps,

Tyson.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Sender: wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.orgDate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:03:57 
To: Developer support list for Wireshark<wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Unused dissector tables

The following dissectors create dissector tables but don't appear to use
them:

packet-aim.c
packet-fcp.c
packet-rfid-mifare.c
packet-rfid-pn532.c
packet-rsvp.c
packet-usb-ccid.c

Should the registration code be disabled or removed?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


Current thread: