Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Build instability
From: Kaul <mykaul () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:44:50 +0200
Also fixed, now epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c is completely broken. This should fix it: svn diff epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c Index: epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c =================================================================== --- epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c (revision 53918) +++ epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c (working copy) @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ /* Forward declarations */ void proto_register_smpp(void); -void proto_reg_handoff_smpp(void) +void proto_reg_handoff_smpp(void); static int dissect_smpp(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data); static guint get_smpp_pdu_len(packet_info *pinfo, tvbuff_t *tvb, int offset); static int dissect_smpp_pdu(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data _U_); On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Kaul <mykaul () gmail com> wrote:
And the above has been fixed. Regretfully, replaced by another compilation failure: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9543 Y. On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kaul <mykaul () gmail com> wrote:Above compilation failure has been fixed. Regretfully, only to be replaced by another compilation failure: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9538 On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Kaul <mykaul () gmail com> wrote:Opened https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9529 on the issue. On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Jakub Zawadzki < darkjames-ws () darkjames pl> wrote:On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:23:23PM +0200, Kaul wrote:Thanks for the automated build links - I guess I'll watch them morecloselyand only sync when my platform passes. Interesting - I'm pulling from trunk and still fail on that. Perhapsitwasn't fixed entirely, or I have to do some cleanup?I agree, it isn't fixed, from_hex() is defined inside: #if defined(HAVE_LIBGNUTLS) && defined(HAVE_LIBGCRYPT) but it's used outside this #ifdef. Kuba.On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke () hauke-m de>wrote:On 12/08/2013 04:30 PM, Kaul wrote:Hi all, I've been trying to enhance a specific dissector for two weeksnow.Since I'm afraid of diverging the code (although I'm working on a specific dissector), I update my code base often (~ once a day). Regretfully, 5 times (in 2 weeks!) this has resulted incompilationfailure.I'm pretty sure (subjectively) this hasn't happened in the past.Anymeasures we can put (continuous build system?) in place toprevent this?Today's failure (2nd failure only today btw): make[5]: Entering directory`/home/yanivk/wireshark/epan/dissectors'CC libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo packet-ssl-utils.c: In function 'ssl_keylog_parse_session_id': packet-ssl-utils.c:4201:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'from_hex_char' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (from_hex_char(line[2*i]) != (ssl_session->session_id.data[i] >> 4) || ^ packet-ssl-utils.c:4218:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'from_hex' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] if (!from_hex(&ssl_session->master_secret, line, len)) ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[5]: *** [libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo] Error 1 Thanks, Y.Hi, There are automated build, they are described here:http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChIntroAutomated.htmlThe last build results are here: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/one_line_per_build The problem you current have was already fixed in current trunk some hours ago. Hauke___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Build instability Kaul (Dec 08)
- Re: Build instability Hauke Mehrtens (Dec 08)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 08)
- Re: Build instability Jakub Zawadzki (Dec 08)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 09)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 09)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 10)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 10)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 10)
- Re: Build instability Kaul (Dec 08)
- Re: Build instability Hauke Mehrtens (Dec 08)