Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow.
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:00:33 -0400
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com> wrote:
Hi, I will revert the change to use a hash table for transport name resolution as soon as I can, the performance is horrible.
It shouldn't be, glib hash tables are pretty efficient. If you profile, where is the time being spent? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Anders Broman (Aug 06)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Evan Huus (Aug 06)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Anders Broman (Aug 06)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Anders Broman (Aug 06)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Anders Broman (Aug 07)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Anders Broman (Aug 06)
- Re: addr_resolv.c, transport name resolution appalingly slow. Evan Huus (Aug 06)