Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:34:51 -0400
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sonny Tavernier <sonny.tavernier () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Evan, I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of the tests. The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more it will be effective, so it seems your idea is complementary to my proposal. I'm wondering if you could comment on my proposal so we could improve it together. Here is the link : http://hacknowledge.lescigales.org/proposal/
I'm not familiar with PIN but I from your proposal I understand it's something like the valgrind framework? The idea is certainly an interesting one, though if my understanding is correct it sounds like an awful lot of work for one summer - I could be wrong though. Evan ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Sonny Tavernier (Apr 15)
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Evan Huus (Apr 15)
- Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage Guy Harris (Apr 15)