Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work.
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
Evan Huus <eapache@...> writes:
There is already a (commented-out) function called dissector_add_uint_sanity_check which does warn on duplicate port registrations and on registrations to port 0. It produces 157 warnings when enabled in the default build. I don't know how many duplicate string registrations there are, but there are definitely some based on valgrind's output.
I took a quick look at EIGRP since tshark was reporting these strange warnings against itself: ** (tshark.exe:6984): WARNING **: ip.proto: eigrp registering using pattern 88 already registered by eigrp ** (tshark.exe:6984): WARNING **: ddp.type: eigrp registering using pattern 88 already registered by eigrp ** (tshark.exe:6984): WARNING **: ipx.socket: eigrp registering using pattern 34238 already registered by eigrp Hmm, so it seems that the doxygen comments are somehow causing this? For example, the following patch eliminates the warnings for me: Index: epan/dissectors/packet-eigrp.c =================================================================== --- epan/dissectors/packet-eigrp.c (revision 44888) +++ epan/dissectors/packet-eigrp.c (working copy) @@ -3351,7 +3351,6 @@ } /** - *@fn void proto_reg_handoff_eigrp(void) * * @param[in] void * @param[out] None The h450, qsig, ssl, tcap and uaudp dissectors report similar warnings against themselves, but for other reasons. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Maynard, Chris (Sep 07)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Evan Huus (Sep 07)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Evan Huus (Sep 08)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Christopher Maynard (Sep 15)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Guy Harris (Sep 15)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Joerg Mayer (Sep 16)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Guy Harris (Sep 16)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Joerg Mayer (Sep 17)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Evan Huus (Sep 08)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Evan Huus (Sep 07)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Christopher Maynard (Sep 15)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Evan Huus (Sep 15)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Bill Meier (Sep 15)
- Re: Disabling a dissector doesn't seem to quite work. Jeff Morriss (Sep 17)