Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply
From: Stuart Kendrick <skendric () fhcrc org>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:35:37 -0700
I'm stumbling on this. Filtering on icmp.resp_in shows me all the Requests Filtering on icmp.resp_to shows me all the Replies Filtering on !icmp.resp_in shows me everything Filtering on !icmp.resp_to shows me everything Filtering on "!icmp.resp_in and !icmp_resp_to" shows me everythingReading the description of these expressions ... I don't understand what they do:
icmp_resp_in - Response In (the response to this request is in this frame) How can an ICMP Request and an ICMP Reply share the same frame?icmp_resp_to = Response To (This is the response to the request in this frame)
How do I specify which request? Would you elaborate? --sk On 10/5/2012 8:22 AM, Martin Isaksson wrote:
Hi Stuart! !icmp.resp_in and !icmp.resp_to There might be an easier way :) /M
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Stuart Kendrick (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Martin Isaksson (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Stuart Kendrick (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Gerald Combs (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Martin Isaksson (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Stuart Kendrick (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply ronnie sahlberg (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply ronnie sahlberg (Oct 06)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Stuart Kendrick (Oct 08)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Stuart Kendrick (Oct 05)
- Re: finding a missing ICMP Echo Reply Martin Isaksson (Oct 05)