Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: r45266: proto_tree_add_uint_format_value(..., value, ..., value + 1)


From: Pascal Quantin <pascal.quantin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:12:33 +0200

Hi,

2012/10/3 Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>

Hi Pascal,

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:36:47AM +0200, Pascal Quantin wrote:
2012/10/3 Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>

Hi,

part of r45266 (or 6427287[1]):

#v+
-  proto_tree_add_item(tf_tree, hf_gsm_a_sm_tft_pkt_flt_id, tvb,
curr_offset, 1, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
+  oct = tvb_get_guint8(tvb, curr_offset) & 0x0f;
+  proto_tree_add_uint_format_value(tf_tree,
hf_gsm_a_sm_tft_pkt_flt_id,
tvb, curr_offset, 1, oct, "%d", oct+1);
#v-

Now user type display filter: 'gsm_a.gm.sm.tft.pkt_flt_id == 4',
later he checks the value in tree and there is 5.

I'm not sure if it's odd only for me (have not read 3GPP 27.007) or if
it
could confuse all the users,
also familiar with this specification.

[1]

http://code.wireshark.org/git/?p=wireshark;a=commitdiff;h=64272873f088a62b8db71e23e0e38c5c8d80194d


a packet filter identifier goes from 1 to 16 but is encoded on 4 bits,
thus
my modification.

But I understand the confusion it can create when applying
a filter. I could add the raw value in parenthesis (as we do for value
string arrays) to make things a bit clearer.
What do you think? Any other suggestion?

Still I don't understand why you decided to have different values for tree
and filter.
Why not:
  proto_tree_add_uint(tf_tree, hf_gsm_a_sm_tft_pkt_flt_id, tvb,
curr_offset, 1, oct + 1); ?


That's what I did first but in that case the bit string displayed before
the filter name does not correspond to the real bit string of the message
in the hex pane:
.... 0010 = Packet filter identifier: 2
while the byte in the hex pane ix 0x31.
I found it even more confusing.

Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: