Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Launching a new window from Display filters
From: FS <bastiji () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:35:39 -0400
Sorry, sent by mistake before completing email. Rest of email below! Thanks On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:34 AM, FS <bastiji () gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Christopher Maynard < Christopher.Maynard () gtech com> wrote:FS <bastiji@...> writes:Thank you for the replies. Both excellent suggestions. Here's anotherone for you gurus then. Lets say I start with a 1 Gig capture file. I see a lot of extraneous chit-chat which I want to completely eradicate and then look at the rest of the streams left. I was thinking more of an option of choose a display filter, and then an option to sort of "discard" the results of the filter and focus on the rest of the capture/conversations.An example could be using a display filter to filter out the broadcast/arp/multicast traffic, and then analyze the leftover data. Again, this can be accomplished by saving the resulting 'noise-free' capture, and then re-opening it to further dissect it, but is there another way to do this?Many thanks for the responses so far!Regards,Basti You can apply a display filter, for example, "arp", then choose, "Edit -> Ignore All Displayed Packets (toggle)". This doesn't discard them, per se, but those packets will no longer match any future display filters you might apply, as Wireshark will now ignore them as if they were no longer present. Ref: http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChWorkIgnorePacketSection.htmlThank you. I got the opportunity to look at another packet capture utility a couple of days ago. The gentleman showed me some tricks around that (Omni-peek to be precise) and this is the feature that caught my eye instantly. When choosing x number of packets, and selecting "Select related to" or some such option, it presented with these four options: - Hide selected packets - Hide unselected packets
- Copy selected packets to another window - Close What can we do to get the third option in wireshark? Thanks, Basti Ji
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 02)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters Jaap Keuter (Oct 02)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters Abhik Sarkar (Oct 03)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 09)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters Christopher Maynard (Oct 10)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 20)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 20)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters Christopher Maynard (Oct 22)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 22)
- Re: Launching a new window from Display filters FS (Oct 09)