Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: FW: Accuracy of wireshark
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:34:56 +0200
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:11:52PM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
If you want to have high precision guaranteed capture then go with a hardware solution. Turbocap would be something I would look at: http://www.riverbed.com/us/products/cascade/wireshark_enhancements/turbocap.php
Or Endace DAG cards: http://www.endace.com/endace-dag-high-speed-packet-capture-cards.html They have nanosecond accurate timestamp, and clock can be synchronized with GPS. Stephen have written nice whitepaper: http://www.lcs.poli.usp.br/~jra/UPC/Traces/timestamping_whitepaper.pdf ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- FW: Accuracy of wireshark Marinucci Elisabetta (Oct 09)
- Re: Accuracy of wireshark Anders Broman (Oct 09)
- Re: Accuracy of wireshark David Arnold (Oct 10)
- Re: FW: Accuracy of wireshark Jaap Keuter (Oct 09)
- Re: FW: Accuracy of wireshark Jakub Zawadzki (Oct 09)
- Re: FW: Accuracy of wireshark Marinucci Elisabetta (Oct 10)
- Re: FW: Accuracy of wireshark Jaap Keuter (Oct 10)
- Re: Accuracy of wireshark Anders Broman (Oct 09)