Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:50:29 -0800
On 11/30/12 12:01 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
Assuming that the conversion script mentioned in https://bugzillaupdate.wordpress.com/2010/07/06/bugzilla-4-0-has-a-new-default-status-workflow/ will be run, it appears that the changes in the current status values will be as follows: “NEW” will become “CONFIRMED” “ASSIGNED” will become “IN_PROGRESS” “REOPENED” will become “CONFIRMED” (and the “REOPENED” status will be removed) “CLOSED” will become “VERIFIED” (and the “CLOSED” status will be removed)
That's correct.
Also, I'm guessing that, after the update, the initial status of a bug will now be "CONFIRMED" (which corresponds with our current initial status of "New"). Or: will we now start with "UNCONFIRMED" ?
UNCONFIRMED has to be enabled in the configuration, otherwise the initial status is CONFIRMED.
That being said, I can imagine that starting with "Confirmed" might cause some puzzlement from those used to seeing "NEW" as the initial status.
Would UNCONFIRMED be less confusing than CONFIRMED? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- fuzz failures not generating bugs Jeff Morriss (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Bill Meier (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Bill Meier (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Guy Harris (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Guy Harris (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Gerald Combs (Nov 30)
- Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs Evan Huus (Nov 30)