Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using global variables to store dissection information
From: Christopher Maynard <christopher.maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 14:57:45 +0000 (UTC)
Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws@...> writes:
There's already packet_info structure which is always private for current dissection. The easiest fix would be to move all global variables to packet_info structure. Anyone against it?
From Guy's comments[1] I got the feeling that the packet_info "katamari" was
already too big and that there was a desire to reduce its size, not increase it. [1]: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201004/msg00129.html ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Using global variables to store dissection information Jakub Zawadzki (May 08)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using global variables to store dissection information Christopher Maynard (May 09)
- Re: Using global variables to store dissection?information Jakub Zawadzki (May 10)
- Re: Using global variables to store dissection?information Anders Broman (May 10)
- Re: Using global variables to store dissection?information Jeff Morriss (May 10)
- Re: Using global variables to store dissection?information Jakub Zawadzki (May 10)
- Re: Using global variables to store dissection information Jim Wright (May 09)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Using global variables to store dissection information Christopher Maynard (May 09)