Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:04:23 -0800
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:The source file itself is fine (well it no longer aborts for me after r41325), but running it through the fuzz tester fails every time. Looks like editcap needs some PCAPNG smarts to avoid corrupting the non-packet parts. (Or Wiretap needs to not give the non-packet parts to editcap.)...or my recent changes to wiretap/pcapng.c broke something, or....
Without fuzzing, editcap will mangle your test file when converted to pcap-NG, so it's not a question of editcap corrupting the non-packet parts. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Jeff Morriss (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Gerald Combs (Mar 02)
- Re: PCAP-NG files being corrupted by fuzz tester Guy Harris (Mar 02)