Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:13:33 -0400
Are you saying that the correct frame is currently not tagged or that it may not always be or...?
I suppose I should find a sample capture and try it out. Anyway: good idea, bad idea? Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,Yes, that setup frame should be sufficient. The problem now is that not the correct setup frame is tagged, but that is another matter. Point is case is the SIP/SDP packet defining the conversation, to which the RTP dissector is set.Thanks, Jaap Send from my iPhone On 1 jun. 2012, at 20:44, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:One of the more frequently asked questions/reported bugs is users filtering for RTP, saving^W exporting those displayed packets, then opening the new capture file only to find plain UDP. This is because the call-setup protocol (e.g., SIP) wasn't included in the display filter. Now we have the ability to mark frames as dependent on others. Should, for example, RTP frames mark the call-setup frames as dependencies? (I noticed that RTP has a Setup Frame field; would one frame really be enough?) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets?, (continued)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Richard Sharpe (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Jeff Morriss (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Anders Broman (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Richard Sharpe (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Gerald Combs (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Andreas Sikkema (Jun 02)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Jeff Morriss (Jun 04)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Jeff Morriss (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Richard Sharpe (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Kukosa, Tomas (Jun 05)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Richard Sharpe (Jun 05)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Jeff Morriss (Jun 01)
- Re: Should payload dissectors' (RTP) packets depend on call-setup dissectors' (SIP) packets? Anders Broman (Jun 01)