Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors?
From: Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:17:30 -0700
On 6/5/12 11:09 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
I wonder if modern GCCs will have that problem or if it's just this version or (doubtful) the architecture. It would be really nice if this file could be split up.
It also repeats a lot of character sequences, e.g. $ grep -c '"org/csapi/' epan/dissectors/packet-parlay.c 1082 It'd be nice to be able to consolidate or compress those down somehow. -- Join us for Sharkfest ’12! · Wireshark® Developer and User Conference Berkeley, CA, June 24-27 · sharkfest.wireshark.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Alexis La Goutte (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Jeff Morriss (Jun 05)
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Gerald Combs (Jun 05)
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Tyson Key (Jun 05)
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Jeff Morriss (Jun 05)
- Re: Make "giop plugins" built in dissectors? Jeff Morriss (Jun 05)