Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: license question
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:16:54 +0200
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:04:55PM +0200, Roland Knall wrote:
or the original download, but the client must be able to receive it without further inquiries.
According to a majority of people who have looked into the GPLv2 in depth and also accoding to the FSF, you are required to provide the source code to anyone who requests it. To my knowledge this interpretation has not yet been "validated" in court. For the FSF view, see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- license question Yosi Saggi (Jul 22)
- Re: license question Jaap Keuter (Jul 22)
- Re: license question Joerg Mayer (Jul 22)
- Re: license question Roland Knall (Jul 22)
- Re: license question Joerg Mayer (Jul 22)