Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:06:10 +0100
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:34:33AM -0500, Jeff Morriss wrote:
Joerg Mayer wrote:On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:01:05PM -0000, Graham Bloice wrote:Most likely it has a problem with the / instead of \ in uil/util.obj. Does someone have an idea how to resolve this?util.obj is being produced in the top level root directory, but the linkerislooking for it in ui\. I'm looking at the makefile now.Hmm. I think this would need an explicit build rule. As it stands, the compiler is told to compile ui/util.c when in the top level directory, so that's where the object file is placed. The linker is told to look for ui/util.obj and complains.Thanks for looking into it. I will look at how to resolve this in the build structure. As this is is going to effect additional files as I move the files around we need a "proper" solution. Ideas are of course welcome ;-)I've been a little uneasy with the fact that there's no makefile in ui/ . It seems like putting source files in there but no makefile is asking for trouble. But I haven't thought about it much.
Adding Makefiles (at least to ui/cli/) is likely to happen. What I fail to see is the difference to the case of editcap (toplevel Makefile.common) where we add epan/crypt/md5.c and epan/nstime.c to the source list. Is the following line of Makefile.nmake responsible for "fixing" this problem: editcap_OBJECTS = $(editcap_SOURCES:.c=.obj) ? Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Joerg Mayer (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Joerg Mayer (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Jeff Morriss (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Joerg Mayer (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Guy Harris (Feb 19)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86 Graham Bloice (Feb 17)