Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:04:04 -0500
Jeff Morriss wrote:
Evan Huus wrote:In cases like bug 8045 [1], it would have been handy for it to say in the report somewhere which build-bot (version and OS) had found the error... is that reasonably easy to do?There's only one buildbot doing the fuzz testing, isn't there? (It's the Clang-Code-Analysis one.)
Oh, nevermind, I just read the -bugs list and see what you mean. I didn't realize that the trunk-1.x buildbots were (successfully) fuzz testing now...
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Evan Huus (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Gerald Combs (Dec 07)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 07)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Bill Meier (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Jeff Morriss (Dec 05)
- Re: Buildbot version number in fuzz-test bugs? Jeff Morriss (Dec 05)