Re: fuzz failures not generating bugs

[Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>]

Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 12/3/12 7:45 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
> > New bugs are showing up in the CONFIRMED state.  Shouldn't they be
> > UNCONFIRMED?
>
> They should, but I don't think any humans have created bugs since the
> last configuration change (the fuzz failure reporting script explicitly
> sets the status to CONFIRMED).

I was thinking of bug 8044 came in yesterday at 21:37 EST which I 
thought was after the last config change (your last email about a config 
change was yesterday at 20:35 EST).
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
            mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe