Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented?
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:05:00 -0500
On 12/14/2012 4:17 AM, Peter Valdemar Mørch wrote:
To this end, I tried your suggestion: > tshark -2 -r unfiltered.pcap -R snmp -w snmp.pcap To which I got: Segmentation fault (core dumped)
At the very least, thark shouldn't crash. Please file a bug report at bugs.wireshark.org attaching the file.This way, the bug can be tracked. In addition, the capture file will be available for future testing.
Thanks ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 13)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 13)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 14)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Bill Meier (Dec 14)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Sake Blok (Dec 15)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 17)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Peter Valdemar Mørch (Dec 14)
- Re: tshark: How to capture SNMP traps (UDP port 162) that might be fragmented? Guy Harris (Dec 13)