Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-users] when using tshark -T, the result xml is not exactly the same as using wireshark?
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:48:57 +0000 (UTC)
damker <damker@...> writes:
Another question When using tshark -T psml and protocol is RSL,the output xml is: But in Wireshark there is more details:
Which version of Wireshark were you using? It would seem that this has been fixed somewhere between Wireshark 1.8.0 and SVN 44510. Using the iPhone_A_bis_card capture file from the Wireshark menagerie, my results are: Wireshark 1.8.0: <packet> <section>240</section> <section>17.952775</section> <section>82.113.68.98</section> <section>82.113.67.56</section> <section>RSL</section> <section>86</section> <section>IMMEDIATE ASSIGN COMMAND </section> </packet> Wireshark r44510: <packet> <section>240</section> <section>17.952775</section> <section>82.113.68.98</section> <section>82.113.67.56</section> <section>RSL</section> <section>86</section> <section>IMMEDIATE ASSIGN COMMAND (CCCH) (RR) Immediate Assignment </section></packet> - Chris ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] when using tshark -T, the result xml is not exactly the same as using wireshark? Christopher Maynard (Aug 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Wireshark-users] when using tshark -T, the result xml is not exactly the same as using wireshark? Christopher Maynard (Aug 14)