Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Protocol correctness analysis
From: Ilya Shvetsov <chvetsov () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:48:44 +0300
This sounds a bit like RTP. This is also analysed, through the use of the tapping mechanism. Have a look at README.tapping (IIRC) and look at the already available taps. Thank you, i will dig into it
But anyway i would like to clarify, what i really need. So there is set of parameters in our packets, some of them are changed from packet to packet, some of them are not. I'm looking for way to check, that all paramters was changed correctly. Like if i have packet number, i would like to know whether this number increases monotonically or not. if not i would like to point user attention on this moment. i hope, this sheds more light on what really i want -- With best regards Ilya 'Akhil' Shvetsov
Thanks, Jaap Send from my iPhone On 19 apr. 2012, at 11:17, Ilya Shvetsov <chvetsov () gmail com> wrote: Hi, there! I wroute my own dissector for our custom protocol. It works good. we are very satisfied with wireshark. But now i have task to check our protocol for errors. we implemented reliable protocol over UDP, so we would like to check whether we have lost packet or not. whether all packet's sequences complete or not. and so on. the question is what is the best way to implement this? I think it will be good to start this task not during cap file opening, but by user request from menu? if this possible, can you point me documentation for this? -- With best regards Ilya 'Akhil' Shvetsov ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: <http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: <https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev> https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe> mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe<wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Protocol correctness analysis Ilya Shvetsov (Apr 19)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Jaap Keuter (Apr 19)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Ilya Shvetsov (Apr 19)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Martin Visser (Apr 19)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Ilya Shvetsov (Apr 20)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Ilya Shvetsov (Apr 19)
- Re: Protocol correctness analysis Jaap Keuter (Apr 19)