Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page
From: Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagoutte () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 20:19:05 +0100
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald () wireshark org> wrote:
Excellent question. We were holding off on making a development release over the summer until the multi-interface capture support settled down. Is there any reason to delay 1.7.0 at this point? On 11/2/11 12:51 AM, Dirk Jagdmann wrote:So today somebody at my company wanted to check the latest Wireshark.Looking at http://www.wireshark.org/download.html he read the description literally which said that the 1.6.0rc2 is the latest development release. So he figured it might be newer than the fresh 1.6.3 release...I think we can remove that old release candidate, or alternatively put adaily/weekly tarball of trunk on that page.
Hi, Why not release a new dev release (based on trunk) to each new release of 1.6.x/1.4.x ? Regards,
---> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic----> http://cubic.org/~doj -----> http://llg.cubic.org___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- misleading description on Wireshark Download page Dirk Jagdmann (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 04)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 05)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Balint Reczey (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Alexis La Goutte (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 02)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Gerald Combs (Nov 07)
- Re: misleading description on Wireshark Download page Chris Maynard (Nov 08)