Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: SPX protocol subdissector
From: Sergey Glebov <sergey.glebov () prismasoft biz>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:16:46 +0300
I fear you can't register your dissector without changing packet-ipx.c....by adding a new dissector table and code to use it.... what requires that you distribute your self-built Wireshark with your
DLL.
...at least until a standard version of Wireshark is released with your
changes (which requires that you give a patch to the Wireshark core developers, e.g. in a bug on bugs.wireshark.org). Thanks everyone :-). Researching sources showed, that there's an spx.socket field available (which, I guess, actually goes up from IPX) - which I could rely on. With best regards Sergey Glebov ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- SPX protocol subdissector Sergey Glebov (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Andreas (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Helge Kruse (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Sergey Glebov (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Stephen Fisher (Nov 25)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Guy Harris (Nov 24)
- Re: SPX protocol subdissector Andreas (Nov 24)