Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:50:51 -0600
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 04:55:02AM +0400, Max Dmitrichenko wrote:
Anyway, the feature introduced in my patch can be reimplemented. But may I ask the dumb question? Who decides here what is going to the trunk and what it should like?
Any of the core developers. But I'm leaving this one up to the more experienced core developers. I'm at 4.5 years and never done much serious work in the memory allocation part of Wireshark. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object, (continued)
- Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 01)
- [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 01)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object darkjames-ws (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Jakub Zawadzki (May 03)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Jeff Morriss (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Guy Harris (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object ronnie sahlberg (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max Dmitrichenko (May 02)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Stephen Fisher (May 03)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Jeff Morriss (May 03)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Freeing memory of se_alloc'ated object Max (May 02)