Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Spam: displaying more than 32 bits
From: "Yosi Saggi" <yosis () designartnetworks com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:08:35 +0200
Why is my message subject marked as spam? From: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Yosi Saggi Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 4:51 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Spam: [Wireshark-dev] displaying more than 32 bits Hi everybody I have a payload that its size is 42 bits. I am getting it from the TVB in little Endian. I have no problem displaying the whole payload as big endian with a guint 64bit variable: guint32 f2_val1, f2_val2; guint64 f2_val; f2_val1 = tvb_get_letohl(tvb, *plen) f2_val2 = tvb_get_letohl(tvb, (*plen+4)); f2_val = f2_val1; f2_val= (f2_val<<32); f2_val = f2_val|f2_val2; My problem is that each group of bits out of the 42 bits represent something different that I want to display on the wireshark. I has no problem with less than 32 bits payload using the “proto_tree_add_item” and the correct bitmask, or using “proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val” Are threr any suggestions what can I use to display it correctly. As I have seen that “proto_tree_add_bits_ret_val”, although having a “big endian/little endian” operand, that “little endian” is not implemented yet. Any help/insight would be much appreciated Yosi
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- displaying more than 32 bits Yosi Saggi (Mar 06)
- Re: Spam: displaying more than 32 bits Yosi Saggi (Mar 06)
- Re: Spam: displaying more than 32 bits Yosi Saggi (Mar 06)
- Re: displaying more than 32 bits Andreas (Mar 06)
- Re: displaying more than 32 bits Yosi Saggi (Mar 06)
- Re: displaying more than 32 bits Chris Maynard (Mar 07)
- Re: Spam: displaying more than 32 bits Yosi Saggi (Mar 06)