Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z
From: Sake Blok <sake () euronet nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:07:32 +0100
On 21 mrt 2011, at 20:40, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 06:37:03PM +0000, Chris Maynard wrote:Any concerns about backward-compatibility? Are folks accustomed to using rtt with tshark instead of srt? Should we support either one going forward, or is it OK to abandon rtt?(without thinking it through very much...) I would say to change it and mention the change in the release notes.
And of course in the Usage, manpage, user manual etc ;-) (and yes... I think it's a joy to make the occasional superfluous remark ;-)) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Guy Harris (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Stephen Fisher (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Sake Blok (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 23)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 23)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Chris Maynard (Mar 21)
- Re: Wireshark -z vs. tshark -z Guy Harris (Mar 21)