Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New GCC, new option required?
From: Bill Meier <wmeier () newsguy com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:23:48 -0400
On 7/13/2011 8:05 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi list, I think we need a new GCC option added to configure.in: AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-unused-but-set-variable) This option came into existence with GCC 4.6 and is causing havoc all over. I've been going through a lot of dissectors, many of which have either: * unused set variables * variables set for a legitimate purpose, but not used (yet) * bugs
I've fixes for a number of the (non-generated) dissectors and will commit them today.
Re: > AC_WIRESHARK_GCC_CFLAGS_CHECK(-Wno-unused-but-set-variable)Is there a (reasionably easy) way to use this option only when compiling in the .../dissectors directory ?
(I think that I've previously addressed the "unused_but_set" warnings for many (all ?) of the other directories). (SVN 37600 & following...)
Bill ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Jaap Keuter (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Guy Harris (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Kaul (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Stephen Fisher (Jul 14)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)
- Re: New GCC, new option required? Bill Meier (Jul 13)